South East Scoobies

South East Scoobies (http://www.southeastscoobies.co.uk/vbulletinforum/index.php)
-   General Car / Scooby Chat (http://www.southeastscoobies.co.uk/vbulletinforum/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   Had the old girl rolling roaded today. (http://www.southeastscoobies.co.uk/vbulletinforum/showthread.php?t=6517)

scooby doo 04-12-2010 06:20 PM

Had the old girl rolling roaded today.
 
Headed up to surrey rolling road today,
managed 284.2bhp at 0.9bar.
its a 1994 wrx,
all standard apart from,full 3" system, hks filter,fuel reg,pump
and a chipped ecu,ported headers.

Is this a good power?
i was thinking maybe nearer 300bhp, still using a standard td05 and wrx tmic.

will say tho charley is a top guy really enjoyed myself.:smile:

Hongkongfooi 04-12-2010 06:24 PM

sounds pretty good to me:doubleup:

scooby doo 04-12-2010 06:28 PM

Would a remap and increase in boost give me that 300bhp iam looking for?

Scott.T 04-12-2010 07:09 PM

Good power for 0.9bar not many get over 300hp even at 1.1bar which is what most chipped pre 96 Ecu run. 0.9bar is pretty stock boost tbh especially if a post Sept 94 model.

scooby doo 04-12-2010 07:32 PM

i belive mine is a pre sept 94 model.
iam still using the daes device as didnt know what boost the ecu was set at,
i thought i had set it to 1bar but looking at the graph its only just under a bar.
so its a good result then for the old girl?

Jolly Green Monster 05-12-2010 01:04 AM

good result yes.

would see more with a custom map but for money spent so far etc thats a good result

still on the slanty intercooler? they are particularly rubbish

Simon

RobEvo5 05-12-2010 08:41 AM

Good result that especially at just 0.9 bar - I got 292bhp from a 1994 wrx stock apart from decat, panel filter, and ESL live map, but was running about 1.2 bar

scooby doo 05-12-2010 11:28 AM

Simon- yes still the standard slanty wrx tmic.
ill post some pictures of the graphs and let you mapping wizzards tell me if it looks good, as i have no idea what they are telling me lol. also dont know what torque it made,
but was surprised it made 220bhp at the wheels what a loss!

Excuse the crappy pictures but you can sort of see them.
http://i756.photobucket.com/albums/x...cture003-2.jpg
http://i756.photobucket.com/albums/x...cture002-3.jpg
http://i756.photobucket.com/albums/x...cture001-3.jpg

Simon/scott does the boost curve look ok as it seems to not be smooth?

Crowman 05-12-2010 11:52 AM

Hi Mate
Good figures for the mods.
I made 276 when i had the very same mods, The slanty IC is pants,also standard injectors wont go much beyond where you are now.

Jolly Green Monster 05-12-2010 08:30 PM

All looks good, the slight dip in the torque amd power curve around 4500rpm could be the ecu pulling timing.

Seen 313 at most on that spec mapped, bit normally just 300 give or take a bit

But really needs fmic and injectors to make it worth you paying out for a map

scooby doo 06-12-2010 11:35 AM

Ok thank you simon, does the boost curve look ok? sorry for the questions , it just means nothing to me.
Benji.

Scott.T 06-12-2010 01:31 PM

Looks a little lean for a SRR plot, on a chipped Pre96 ECU.
I would expect it to be 10-10.5 on the rollers for a generic type chip, which is can be 11-11.5AFR on the road.

MAF may need a clean and the slightly leaner mix would account for the slight increase in power over what is expected and as simon mentioned a little bit of det causing the timing to be pulled as touch.

Jolly Green Monster 06-12-2010 01:39 PM

Boost looks fine

Agree fuelling looks more like a custom map fuelling which would be mapped to suit

If not already on a walbro pump it would be worth adding

scooby doo 06-12-2010 01:56 PM

walbro 255 and aeromotive fuel reg at 3.bar,
ive sent my apexi fc away to hopefully be fixed, so will be mapped to that.

RobEvo5 06-12-2010 02:05 PM

Boost control looks very steady at 0.9bar - It flat lines when it gets to 0.9 bar and just stays there all the way to the red line. Would be good to get is to spike a little bit and then tail back to 0.9bar, which would increase the torque and make it feel that more quicker.

Was that boost on a DAWES device ?. If so its doing very well at controlling the boost.

I've currently got one fitted to mine which I am trying out, but its peaking too high and the higher gears are causing the car to boost higher than i would like in 4th/5th.

Jolly Green Monster 06-12-2010 03:14 PM

I would up the pressure slightly to 3.1-3.2bar in light of the slight pull back in the power and torque curve and slightly richer shouldnt hurt.

Simon

Jolly Green Monster 06-12-2010 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobEvo5 (Post 68316)
Boost control looks very steady at 0.9bar - It flat lines when it gets to 0.9 bar and just stays there all the way to the red line. Would be good to get is to spike a little bit and then tail back to 0.9bar, which would increase the torque and make it feel that more quicker.

Was that boost on a DAWES device ?. If so its doing very well at controlling the boost.

I've currently got one fitted to mine which I am trying out, but its peaking too high and the higher gears are causing the car to boost higher than i would like in 4th/5th.

Thats the main issue with a dawes no gear
Compensation but otherwise very good

scooby doo 06-12-2010 03:35 PM

Rob- Yes iam using the dawes device.
Simon i will up the fuel pressure,
Thanks guys for the advice

Chunk 06-12-2010 03:48 PM

Pretty good results


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.